Skip to content
upshift
Consulting Firms

You moved off the billable hour. If you’re still selling undefined work, you only renamed the discount.

What’s happening

The scramble off the billable hour is real and nearly universal. The Wall Street Journal reported consulting and accounting firms moving away from hourly billing, with a Deloitte town hall reportedly showing traditional hourly work shrinking toward a sliver of the market within a decade. The near-universal response is to change the pricing label, hourly to fixed fee, fixed fee to outcome-based, while selling the same undefined advisory work underneath.

Relabeling does not escape the squeeze. It renames it. Outcome pricing bolted onto advisory that was never productized is still a discount, because the buyer still cannot tell what they are paying for. When AI compresses the analysis, and McKinsey’s internal tool now redirects roughly $12 million a month of consultant capacity away from research, a loosely scoped fixed fee just locks in a lower number for the same fuzzy deliverable. The firm took on the risk of AI’s speed and handed the savings to the client.

The firms that actually escaped were not repricing. They were built differently. Newton Consulting has tied every fee to operational outcomes since 2001, measured in things like waste removed and costs cut, and its managing partner told the Journal it is “incredibly difficult to pivot toward this if this is not what your organization represents.” Pricing follows the offering. You cannot price an outcome you have not built the firm to deliver.

TSIA named the stakes for everyone still standing on the old base. Bo DiMuccio wrote that if a firm’s revenue still depends on hours or headcount, AI will keep eroding its margins. Changing the line item on the invoice does not change the base the revenue rests on. Only redefining what the firm sells does that, and the pricing model is the last step, not the first.

Where this sits: The Three Shifts

Why the obvious responses don’t work

Switch from hourly to fixed-fee

This moves the risk of AI’s speed onto you without changing what the client is buying. A fixed fee on undefined work is a capped discount where you now absorb the overruns too. The scope is still fuzzy, so the price is still a negotiation the client wins.

Rebrand the engagement as outcome-based

An outcome you cannot measure is a slogan. If the deliverable is still a deck and a set of recommendations, “outcome pricing” is an hourly discount with better marketing, and the buyer can tell. Outcome pricing needs a defined outcome, which most firms have not built.

Wait until you have the AI tools before repricing

The pricing problem is not a tooling problem. The firms with the best AI stack and the vaguest offerings are repricing themselves fastest, because the efficiency shows up to the client as a lower bill instead of a better product. Tools without a redefined offering accelerate the squeeze.

What’s working instead

The escape is not a new pricing model on the old work. It is designing what you sell so the outcome is definable, then pricing on it. The firms pulling ahead productize a piece of their methodology into something the client can see and name: decision infrastructure they use continuously, a bounded transformation with a measured result, a monitored program on a retainer. Once the offering is defined, the price has something real to attach to, and AI makes that offering more valuable rather than cheaper. Pricing follows the offering. Build the offering first.

The pattern is the same across every firm that gets this right: they stop optimizing the old model and build new offerings around what AI cannot do. The Workshop is the facilitated day we do this work with you. You leave with 2–3 offering briefs, specified and priced. Your team tests them with named clients, then builds what earns it.